FuelCellsWorks

Industry News & Information Leader

SFC EFOY ReliOn Hydrogenics Honda Plug Power Toyota BMW

Latest News

Trenergi Completes Cleantech Residential CHP Solution Proof of Concept

HOPKINTON, Mass. – (Business Wire) Trenergi Corp, located at 116 South Street, Hopkinton, MA has successfully completed the proof-of-concept development phase of its TrionTM residential microCHP product. Trenergi is developing 1KW, 3KW and 5KW versions of the TrionTM to provide clean, dependable distributed energy solutions for homes in markets throughout the world.

The TrionTM is being designed to operate on a variety of fuels. The 1KW system successfully operated from a gas mixture simulating natural gas feedstock. Dr. Mohammad Enayetullah, Trenergi’s CTO, stated: “We are pleased that our stack power output exceeded engineering expectations.”

While the TrionTM, powered by a high temperature PEM fuel cell, generates electricity, its thermal management system also provides heat for both residential hot water and residential heating systems. Charles Myers, President, noted that Trenergi’s new system “advances the concept that fuel cell-based solutions can offer a cost effective three-energy solution meeting the needs of a global market by providing electricity, heat and hot water from a single package”.

About Trenergi

Trenergi, founded in 2009, is developing 1KW, 3KW and 5KW versions of the TrionTM to provide clean, dependable distributed energy solutions for homes in markets throughout the world. Trenergi’s high temperature PEM fuel cell technology allows it to use lower fuel grades while simplifying the balance of plant and dramatically extending fuel cell life. Next steps for Trenergi are to refine product packaging and control interfaces.

June 14, 2010 - 4:32 PM No Comments

First building in the upcoming CleanTech Park in Jurong will be the first in Singapore to run on hydrogen power generated in-house

 

 

 

Developer’s CleanTech One building to be first of its kind here in 2011

By Grace Chua

THE first building in the upcoming CleanTech Park in Jurong will be the first in Singapore to run on hydrogen power generated in-house.

To be completed late next year, the developer JTC Corporation’s CleanTech One building will have a one-megawatt power plant that will generate hydrogen when it is fed wood chips, plant waste and other biological material.

The fuel-cell plant, expected to provide about 20 per cent of CleanTech One’s power needs, is the latest foray into hydrogen-fuel technology here.

The fuel produces no polluting carbon dioxide when turned into energy and is hence regarded as ‘clean’.

Companies and institutions worldwide are trying to adopt hydrogen-fuel technology as a possible replacement for fossil fuels, which produce carbon dioxide when burned to generate electricity.

The accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been identified as a key factor behind climate change.

Besides chugging along on hydrogen power, CleanTech One has other eco-friendly features, including the generous use of natural ventilation, a dehumidifier powered by solar energy and a biodigester to decompose food waste cleanly, a JTC spokesman said.

JTC’s director of its aerospace, marine and cleantech cluster Tang Wai Yee said CleanTech One would be a test-bed for such technology, and expressed hope that other clean technologies would be discovered or commercialised there.

Hydrogen fuel cells work by converting the chemical energy of hydrogen into electricity and water. The gas can be obtained from hydrocarbon-containing fuels like natural gas, biogas and diesel.

Cost is one obstacle to its wider use.

Producing power from hydrogen fuel cells now costs about $4,000 per kilowatt (kW), said Mr Avier Lim, the founder of fuel-cell firm GasHub Technology.

This price tag makes hydrogen power generation competitive only in places like rural Indonesia, for instance, where the costs of diesel-power generation and generator maintenance are relatively high.

Statistics from the United States Department of Energy put the cost of diesel-power generation at US$800 to US$1,500 (S$1,130 to S$2,120) per kW.

Developer JTC would not disclose the cost of its hydrogen fuel cell plant; it would say only that it was included in the $90 million it cost to design and build its building.

GasHub’s Mr Lim reckons a plant that size can take three to four years to recoup its costs, depending on its efficiency.

Hydrogen fuel projects have had a patchy record here.

In last year’s Shell Eco-Marathon, a hydrogen fuel cell car built by a National University of Singapore team travelled 484km on a single litre of the fuel.

But previous hydrogen-fuel pilot projects, such as a scheme to make small, powerful power generators, have failed.

The Rolls Royce one costing US$100 million to US$200 million started five years ago, in which the Singapore Government had a stake, could not progress to production stage due to technical issues.

Mr Lim said fuel cells need more support infrastructure and government endorsement, as is available in other countries.

Associate Professor Lu Wen Feng of the National University of Singapore, who supervises the Eco-Marathon hydrogen car team, said the efficiency and reliability of fuel cells need improving.

June 14, 2010 - 1:28 PM No Comments

Power And Energy Inc. Named a Top Innovator Winner

 

 

Award Recognizes Cutting Edge Private Companies Driving the Future of Innovation

 

For Immediate Release

IVYLAND, Pa./EWORLDWIRE/June 14, 2010 — Power+Energy is pleased to announce that it has been selected as a winner of the annual New York Venture Summit Top Innovator award by youngStartUp Ventures. The list of privately held companies recognizes those that play a leading role in innovation for the Technology, Life Sciences and Clean-tech sectors.

As one of the winners, President and COO of Power+Energy Noel Leeson, will present the company at the exclusive 2010 New York Venture Summit on June 17th at The Hotel Penn in New York City, where a select group of 450 entrepreneurs, investors, and corporate developers will gather to be the first to meet this next wave of leading edge companies. Power+Energy is honored to be in this very elite group of youngStartUp Ventures Top Finalists.

Honoring the Best

To Honor the youngStartUp Ventures Top Innovator recipients, youngStartUp Ventures has invited their CEOs and founders to present at The New York Venture Summit, a forum for the most exciting early stage and emerging growth companies, and to share their insights on the future of innovation,and the entrepreneurial journey. Held at The Hotel Penn in New York City, this intimate, invitation-only conference is the premier venue for today’s promising startups. For more information on the summit visit: YoungStartUp.com(http://www.youngstartup.com/newyork2010/overview.php).

About Power+Energy

Power+Energy is leading the way to the hydrogen economy with proprietary manufacturing and patented hydrogen purification, separation and generation technologies. Power+Energy’s Micro-Channel palladium-alloy hydrogen purifiers purify any grade of hydrogen to nine-nines purity, meeting the most stringent requirements for semiconductor fabrication processes, including light emitting diode manufacture, solar cell manufacture and the manufacture of other compound and silicon semiconductors. Power+Energy’s Micro-Channel hydrogen purifiers are also ideal for metallurgy, R&D, and instrumentation applications. Power+Energy’s Micro-Channel membrane systems can also be used to efficiently separate hydrogen from reformed fuels and synthesis gas mixtures.

Power+Energy is now applying its hydrogen expertise to the fuel cell vehicle refueling market. Power+Energy has recognized that highly compact, low cost, and efficient hydrogen generators that can convert existing liquid fuels to hydrogen at the refueling station will enable the rapid development of the hydrogen refueling infrastructure that fuel-cell vehicles will require. The company’s expertise in the design and manufacture of micro-channel gas processors provides the basis for this exciting new venture.

June 14, 2010 - 12:25 PM No Comments

Fuel Cells UK publishes Manifesto for the New Coalition Government

ACCELERATING COMMERCIALISATION OF FUEL CELLS IN THE UK: FUEL CELLS UK MANIFESTO FOR THE NEW UK GOVERNMENT

The UK fuel cell and hydrogen sector has the potential to become Britain’s low carbon energy success story – contributing to the achievement of the UK’s environment and energy goals and driving the transition to a low carbon future. At this crucial time for both the UK economy and the global environment, Fuel Cells UK calls on the newly established Government to adopt new measures to support the fuel cell and hydrogen sector in the UK so that it can play its role in delivering low carbon jobs together with a range of other policy benefits.

Key priorities for the newly established Government include addressing the economic downturn and national debt in the short term while, simultaneously, reducing greenhouse gases emissions and improving Britain’s energy security through into the medium to long term. Achieving these require immediate action to stimulate the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Fuel cells and hydrogen could revolutionise the energy landscape, bringing high efficiency, low carbon solutions for transport, residential, portable and premium power applications. While the technology has been perceived as a future technology this is decidedly not the case; the technology is ‘here and now’ with commercialisation of fuel cells and hydrogen energy in early markets well underway and the rate of installation and deployment is accelerating rapidly – for example:

•More than 14,000 fuel cells units for the niche transport application have been sold internationally, including materials handling devices such as forklifts

•More than 11,000 small stationary fuel cells units have been deployed globally

•In 2008, the installed capacity of fuel cells in large scale stationary applications reached 170MWe

Over the past years, the UK’s environmental and energy policy focused on financial and regulatory support for renewable energy generation; however meeting the ambitious 80% carbon emissions reduction target by 2050, requires the UK to improve its energy efficiency and maximise use of existing and future resources. The Government needs to recognize the importance and role of the whole range of low-carbon solutions – including environmental and economic benefits offered by widespread deployment of fuel cells. The following illustrate how fuel cells can help deliver key policy objectives:

•Fuel cells produce between 0g (for hydrogen produced from renewable sources) and ~85g (for hydrogen produced from fossil fuels) of CO2/km, compared to a gasoline internal combustion engine, which produces approximately ~170g of CO2/km

•A mass produced fuel cell vehicle with 350-mile all-electric range is projected to cost less than plug-in hybrid and full battery-electric vehicle

•6,000 fuel cell CHP units, commercially available today, rated at 400kWe (each sufficient to power a supermarket or school) would deliver the same level of CO2 reductions as the proposed Severn Barrage, and could be in place in 5 years at more than 3 times lower capital cost

•…if 5.6 million homes had microCHP installed by 2020, the saved CO2 emissions would be equivalent to the emissions from eight new 750MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine power stations

If the UK is to benefit from growing the fuel cell and hydrogen industry, the Government needs to fast track legislative and fiscal incentives at this pivotal point in the industry’s evolution. Fuel Cells UK calls on the newly established Government to support the industry through the following key measures:

1. Extending support for fuel cells as part of the Feed-In Tariff scheme:

Support should be expanded to low-carbon fuel cell electricity generation to 5MW, to fuel cell CHP up to 5MWe, and gas-fired microCHP up to 50kW, as enabled by the Energy Act 2008. This will help fuel cells to achieve their potential in delivering key policy objectives, whilst accelerating the development of the UK industry.

2. Focusing support for commercial development:

There is a need for focused support for the development of near-commercial fuel cells (including materials, components and manufacturing scale-up techniques). This could play an important role in helping to bridge the gap between research and demonstration, and facilitate longer-term cost reduction through manufacturing volume increases.

3. Providing ongoing demonstration support activity:

Demonstration programmes are an essential tool to accelerate the development of emerging energy technologies and solutions and to ensure the UK fuel cell industry plays a leading role in the emerging European market.

4. Using Forward Commitment Procurement:

Forward commitment procurement provides the market with the certainty necessary to justify intensive product development effort and “underwrite” significant financial risk.

5. Changing existing regulation:

Planning and health and safety ‘red tape’ which is currently hindering hydrogen and fuel cell projects should be reviewed with a view to facilitating faster, cheaper and easier installation.

6. Introducing Enhanced Capital Allowances and tax breaks for the low-carbon industry:

These will help to promote investment in decentralized generation, including fuel cells and hydrogen.

Adopting these measures will enhance fuel cells’ and hydrogen’s competitiveness and allow the market to stimulate further low-carbon technology development. We call on the new Government to act promptly to ensure that this ‘window of opportunity’ for fuel cells and hydrogen is not closed before the benefits for our economy, climate and wider energy market can be realised.

This document is accompanied by two annexes providing further detail on the rationale for Government’s support for fuel cells (Annex 1) and detailed description of suggested policy measures (Annex 2).

This document has been produced by Synnogy Ltd, which manages Fuel Cells UK on behalf of its members. Whilst every care has been taken on compiling this information in this guide, Synnogy Ltd, cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. The views and judgements expressed in this document are those of the various contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of Synnogy Ltd.

Annex 1

The rationale for UK Government support for fuel cells and hydrogen

Fuel cells and hydrogen can:

• contribute substantially to a global low carbon economy;

• improve urban air quality and the health of urban populations;

• enhance energy security by allowing a wider choice of fuels;

• contribute to the alleviation of fuel poverty through superior efficiency relative to conventional technologies and ensure that every home is adequately and affordably heated; and

• provide essential intermediate and final components of any future hydrogen economy.

Further details of the greenhouse gas reduction potential as well as benefit to the UK economy that fuel cells and hydrogen can offer are presented below.

1.1 The energy and climate change benefits of fuel cells

- Greater efficiency in extracting energy embedded in various fuels:

Fuel cells can operate on the range of different fuels including: natural gas, biogas, hydrogen, methanol and many others. They offer the potential to deliver clean, quiet heat and power at efficiencies in the 80-90% range, with power only generation fuel cell systems provide equally impressive benefits (this compares with an efficiency of 35% for conventional power generation).

The hydrogen needed to power fuel cell vehicles can be produced directly from a wide range of zero carbon sources such as biomass (at a much lower carbon footprint than second generation biodiesel), nuclear or solar (directly from the heat, not via electricity) as well as from conventional fossil fuels and via electrolysis.

- Similar CO2 savings to those offered by other technologies supported by the Government at lower cost:

6,000 fuel cell CHP units, commercially available today (range of 250-400kW, rated at 400kWe (sufficient to power a supermarket or school)) would deliver the same level of CO2 emissions reductions as the proposed Severn Barrage, and could be in place in 5 years at more than 3 times lower capital cost. There are already many examples of working installations (e.g. at the Transport for London Palestra Building in Southwark). Depending on the installation, a 2kW stationary fuel cell unit can save up to 5 tonnes of CO2 per annum. It has been estimated that, if 5.6 million homes had microCHP installed by 2020, the saved CO2 emissions would be equivalent to the emissions from eight new 750MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine power stations. The benefits of fuel cell microgeneration are already being realised worldwide, including in Japan where more than 5,800 units have been installed to date.

Results from a full lifecycle analysis, comparing CO2 emissions from a traditional petrol internal combustion engine, with CO2 emissions from a hydrogen powered fuel cell vehicle, show that the internal combustion engine accounts for 167g/km, while the fuel cell system produces from 0g/km (when fuelled by renewably generated hydrogen) to 85g/km (when fuelled by hydrogen generated using fossil fuels).

- Improved air quality

By excluding combustion from the process of electricity generation, fuel cells improve general air quality by eliminating nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides and particulate matter from exhausts.

1.2 Grid balancing: additional benefits of deployment of fuel cells and hydrogen

- Energy Storage

Fuel cells in partnership with electrolysers and hydrogen storage systems can help to address situations when electricity production from renewables exceeds demand. Excess electricity can be used to produce hydrogen, which can be stored and then used in a fuel cell to meet demand for either stationary power or motive power for a fuel cell powered vehicle.

- Managing intermittency of renewables

Storage, in combination with fuel cells, can also be used to assist with peak shaving when demand is high and renewable electricity production is insufficient to meet demand. In addition to increasing the reliability of supply, this negates the need for traditional spinning or standing reserve, which tend to be either open gas turbine generators, or fossil fuel power plants that are used as back-up to provide emergency power at peak times. This traditional approach has negative implications both in terms of carbon emissions and the renewable energy challenge.

- Systems already operating in the UK

An example of a working fuel cell installation in this type of application is the PURE Project on Unst in the Shetland Islands. The system consists of two 15kW wind turbines, a high pressure hydrogen electrolyser, high pressure hydrogen storage device, a fuel cell and an inverter. The output provides power and heating for five businesses on the island, with the stored hydrogen being also used to power fuel cell / battery hybrid vehicles.

1.3 The Economic Case

- Value of the global and UK fuel cell market

Recent estimations suggest that the global fuel cell market could be worth over $26bn in 2020 and over $180bn in 2050. The UK share of this market could be $1bn in 2020 rising to $19bn in 2050. In recent year the fuel cell sector has continued to grow, despite the global economic downturn; experiencing a 41% increase in shipments in 2009 relative to 2008.

- Creation of the new ‘green collar’ jobs

Recent reports indicate that global fuel cell industry could create as many as 700,000 jobs in the manufacturing sector by 2019, rising to over one million if installation, service and maintenance jobs are included.

- Growth of intellectual property within the UK: Strong research and development activity means that the UK is the second most successful country in the EU (behind Germany) at securing new fuel cell related patents.

- Improved competitiveness on the emerging energy markets globally: The UK represents one of the strongest global markets for fuel cell investment. In 2008, there were 10 times as many companies listed on the AIM market as the NASDAQ. These developments ensure that the UK is able to compete globally and continue attracting investors and creating wealth.

Annex 2

Detailed description of suggested policy measures

2. 1 Extending support for fuel cells as part of the Feed-In Tariff scheme.

Fuel Cells UK would like to see expansion of the existing feed-in tariff scheme in line with the Energy Act 2008, which includes electricity generated by fuel cells in the list of sources that are eligible for FIT support.

Fuel Cells UK strongly advocates that:

a. The limit for fuel cell power generating installations (whether powered with fossil or renewable fuels) is set at 5MW to encompass the larger systems which are commercially available today. This would allow larger scale decentralised low carbon generation to benefit from the scheme, contributing to carbon reduction objectives (through greatest efficiencies in extracting energy from fuels when compared to conventional generation) and accelerating progress in reducing the costs of fuel cell installations.

b. Fossil fuelled (as well as biogas and anaerobic digester gas fuelled) fuel cell CHP installations up to the limit set in the Energy Act 2008 (i.e. 5MWe) are included in the FIT during the first revision of the mechanism. This would allow the UK to use all available approaches to achieving the Government’s carbon reduction budgets and the long term target of 80% carbon emissions reductions by 2050, and would be complementary to the development of strong renewable energy capacity to meet the 2020 renewables target.

c. Fuel cell microCHP is fully incorporated in the scheme following the trial period. It would fall under the category of natural gas-fired CHP under 50kW, as stated in the Energy Act 2008.

2. 2 Focusing support for commercial development

In any innovative product development process, the final phase (taking a prototype from the laboratory and turning it into a cost-competitive, engineered and quality assured product) is typically the most costly point on the curve. In established businesses this phase is usually funded internally via retained profits from other products. Given the new-to-world status of many fuel cell and hydrogen energy technologies these internal sources are not available at the levels required to achieve timely product development. External assistance is required to accelerate this phase and to avoid UK companies losing their competitive advantage or relocating to more supportive countries, particularly Germany.

Assistance of this sort (at a materials and components as well as at a system level) would play a key role in bridging the gap between research and demonstration, and facilitate longer-term cost reduction through manufacturing volume increases. Making such support available not only through cooperative / consortium programmes but also to single companies to efficiently pursue their development would also accelerate this process and can be achieved through a long term commitment (at least 5 years).

Whilst the Technology Strategy Board and the Carbon Trust provide established mechanisms to support research and technology development, we believe that there is a growing need for focused support (e.g. in the form of grants and / or rolled up tax breaks) for fuel cell product development as well. Grant programmes can be very successful in stimulating technologies in their very early stages of commercialisation, as has been proved by the Low Carbon Building Programme and Clear Skies list (now the Microgeneration Certification Scheme).

There is also a need for funded work on safety, codes and standards and education in support of hydrogen production, storage and consumption.

Fuel Cells UK recommends that:

a. Total funding of £75 – £100 million over 5 years is allocated for commercial fuel cell products development. This will create certainty in the market, and work in harmony with European funding strategy, such as the Joint Technology Undertaking (JTU), maximising the ability of such support to accelerate the development process.

b. The Government should commit to the extension of capital grants in order to help the deployment of fuel cells and hydrogen in the energy market at a faster rate than would otherwise be the case

c. The level of grant available for a particular technology, whether it be fuel cells or other low carbon technology, should reflect the potential contribution of that technology to the realisation of policy objectives such as the reduction of CO2, as well as other environmental and social objectives, such as the alleviation of fuel poverty, improved energy security and minimisation of other pollutants. This will help to ensure that technologies that offer considerable energy and carbon saving potential, but which, due to low production volumes at present, are less commercially developed and consequently more expensive, receive the necessary support to bring them to market.

d. Support should be analogous to that previously adopted under the Low Carbon Buildings Programme. For instance, a purchaser of a fuel cell system could receive a capital grant of £1,000 for each kW of electrical capacity installed. Such a scheme was initiated by the US Department of Defence under their Climate Change Rebate Project, which provides $1,000/kW installed capacity. This support also applies to US operations outside of the USA (such as in Woking, Surrey, where the first stationary fuel cell was installed in the UK). Support under this scheme must not exceed one third of the overall project costs.

e. Fuel cells and hydrogen are eligible for credits under the emissions trading scheme.

f. Research to facilitate the development of codes and standard for hydrogen production, storage and use be supported.

2. 3 Providing ongoing demonstration support activity:

Demonstration programmes are a vital element in bringing high value, high cost new energy systems to market. Unlike in the USA, there is extremely limited late-stage venture capital funding available for demonstration and product development in the UK; consequently, most fuel cell companies are reliant upon State support to assist with this element of the innovation chain.

Fuel Cells UK believes that:

a. There is a clear need for a firm commitment from the Government for ongoing demonstration support programme in fuel cells and hydrogen, to build investor confidence and ensure that the UK industry continues to expand.

b. Whilst Fuel Cells UK welcomed the earlier demonstration programmes as first steps in supporting demonstration in the UK, there is a need for an ongoing strategy of support. In order for the UK to compete effectively, we believe a minimum figure of £100–£150 million over five years from 2011 is required.

d. Demonstration programmes are a key support tool in the funding landscape along with forward commitment and regulatory support. It is vital that they are well designed and tailored to the needs of the industry, and that different support mechanisms dovetail to provide access to funds at all stages of development, ensuring that the risks of investment are rewarded.

e. The Government should learn from successful programmes and strategies adopted overseas, e.g. Japan, USA and Germany, where there are currently major development programmes.

2.4 Using Forward Commitment Procurement

Forward Commitment Procurement (FCP) is a valuable tool for underwriting the investment required in scaling up production, and in placing the risks of new technology introduction with those parties best placed to manage them (technology risk with the supplier and market risk with the purchaser). An FCP process helps to set clear objectives for the technology and create the market confidence that is required to attract further investment and development, despite requiring no additional funding.

Forward orders under forward procurement deals have a proven track record of stimulating growth and development. Recent FCP examples include deals for tens of thousands of products between fuel cell CHP companies and utilities – including two leading fuel cell companies, Ceramic Fuel Cells and Ceres Power that entered agreements with EWE and Centrica respectively.

Internationally, a number of governments have used FCP to stimulate commercialization of new technologies. One example is a Swedish procurement competition for heat pumps in 1990s that led to significant reduction in ground source heat pump costs and expansion of sales. Other Swedish procurement competitions resulted in similarly impressive results for energy efficient ventilation systems as well as small scale solar heating and household water appliances.

Fuel Cells UK:

a. Strongly supports the principles of Forward Commitment to Buy (FCB) as an economic tool within the business to business sector, to drive investment and innovation.

b. Strongly supports the previous Government’s commitment, set out in its Sustainable Procurement Action Plan, to Forward Commitment Procurement (FCP) in the public sector, to promote socially and environmentally beneficial technologies and as a tool for realising policy objectives.

c. Believes that the Government should design a framework for managing and evaluating FCP projects to ensure that costs and specifications are appropriately set and that the needs of the market have been adequately taken into account in the design of any programme.

d. Recommends that the Government facilitates the development of a suite of Forward Commitment Programmes to support the use of fuel cells and hydrogen energy in a range of applications, thus helping to accelerate commercialisation of fuel cells and development of hydrogen infrastructure, in turn bringing forward the associated policy benefits. These could be applied at central, regional or local level, with economies of scale being achievable where several regions / locations collaborate on the procurement.

2.5 Ensuring appropriate regulation

In order to deliver policy objectives, the Government should, over time, introduce legislative requirements to purchase fuel cells and use hydrogen as a low carbon fuel. The introduction of a microgeneration obligation into building regulations is one of the most effective ways of supporting uptake of modern microgeneration technologies including fuel cells. In the UK, an example of how such regulations can work effectively is the requirement to install high efficiency boilers. At the same time, the planning barriers to the use of hydrogen and fuel cells must be removed, and local / regional governments should be provided with hydrogen and fuel cell projects implementation training from central Government.

Fuel Cells UK would like to see the Government:

a. Introducing a requirement that a certain level of fuel cell capability should be installed in new buildings. This will help bring this technology forward and will be similar to the one already existing for high efficiency boilers.

b. Minimise planning and other constraints associated with the implementation of fuel cell and hydrogen projects through appropriate regulations, and provide training to local and regional governments.

2. 6 Introducing Enhanced Capital Allowances and Tax Breaks for the low carbon industry

Enhanced Capital Allowances (ECAs) are a mechanism which allows businesses to write off the whole of the capital cost of their investment in eligible technologies against their taxable profits of the period during which they make the investment. They are a strong incentive for utilities in the context of installed capacity. Under current rules, whereas 1GW centralised capacity would qualify for ECAs, 1GW decentralised capacity would not.

Fuel Cells UK advises that:

a. There is a need for a level playing field to address this inconsistency. The introduction of such an incentive would effectively be cost neutral for the Government and go a long way to incentivising the development of a sustainable, low carbon energy network.

b. In addition, the Government should consider supporting product development through the existing corporation tax system. This could include measures such as an extension of the current R&D tax credit system to enable claims to be made against a wider range of expenditure and against part-funded development programmes, or additional tax credits against product development expenditure payable in cash rather than offset against future taxable profits.

Fuel Cells UK will be delighted to work with all parts of the newly established Government to help ensure that fuel cells deliver their potential to help grow the UK economy and address energy and environmental policy goals.

June 14, 2010 - 8:00 AM No Comments

Biofuel cell retrieves copper

 

 

Producing energy and recovering copper from waste water at the same time: this is what Wageningen UR environmental technologists are doing with their new microbial fuel cell.

‘We obtain quite a lot of electricity from the process. In addition, copper dissolved in water is turned into a layer of copper on the electrode of the microbial fuel cell’, says Annemiek ter Heijne, who published the basic principles of the microbial fuel cell in Environmental Science & Technology in the beginning of June.
In microbial fuel cells bacteria grow on anodes. They break down the organic waste in water and produce electrons. These electrons transmute the copper solution in the water into solid copper on the cathode of the fuel cell. Here an orange layer emerges which consists of pure copper. To make this process possible a special type of membrane is needed that regulates the pH value in the fuel cell.Scaling up
Ter Heijne has now described the principles underlying this microbial fuel cell. Further research is needed to scale up and apply the process. She is thinking of applying the process in Chile, for example, to purify waste water from the copper mines and simultaneously convert biomass into energy. An elegant feature of the microbial fuel cell is that it enables environmental technologists to vary the extraction of copper and energy. Under oxygen-free (anaerobic) conditions 85 percent of the electrons produced by bacteria reclaim copper in solid form; under oxygen-rich (aerobic) conditions this is only 43 percent. In the latter case the fuel cell produces more energy. ‘If your particular aim is to remove copper, it’s better to work under oxygen-free conditions. But if you want to produce electricity, you have to add more oxygen’, says Ter Heijne. The energy output of her prototype is high. Her guess is that copper acts as a catalyst in the production of energy. / Albert Sikkema

June 14, 2010 - 7:15 AM No Comments