| No currently
known bacteria that allow termites and cows to digest cellulose, can power
a microbial fuel cell and those bacteria that can produce electrical current
cannot eat cellulose. But careful pairing of bacteria can create a fuel
cell that consumes cellulose and produces electricity, according to a team
of Penn State researchers.
"We have gotten microbial fuel cells
to work with all kinds of biodegradable substances including glucose, wastewater
and other organic wastes," says John M. Regan, assistant professor of environmental
engineering. "But, cellulose is tricky. There is no known microbe that
can degrade cellulose and reduce the anode.
"We overcame this by putting together
a microbe that can degrade and ferment cellulose and an anode-reducing
bacterium that can live off the fermentation products," he says.
Microbial fuel cells work through
the action of bacteria that can pass electrons to an anode. The electrons
flow from the anode through a wire to the cathode, producing an electric
current. In the process, the bacteria consume organic matter in the water
or sediment.
Plants produce cellulose to use as
their cell walls and to provide rigidity to their structure. Along with
lignin and hemicellulose, they make up huge amounts of the biomass produced
by plants. Some animals, ruminants and termites for example, can break
down cellulose with the aid of bacteria that live in their digestive tract.
Humans and most vertebrates derive little nutrition from cellulose.
The researchers, who include Regan;
Thomas E. Ward, research associate; and Zhiyong Ren, graduate student,
looked at Clostridium cellulolyticum, a bacterium that ferments cellulose,
and Geobacter sulfurreducens, an electroactive bacterium. Both are anaerobic,
living in places where no free oxygen exists. This fermenter produces acetate,
ethanol and hydrogen. The electroactive bacteria consumed some of the acetate
and ethanol. They report the results of their study in a recent online
issue of Environmental Science and Technology.
"We thought that maybe we did not
need a binary setup, maybe uncharacterized bacterial consortia would work"
says Regan. "It worked, but not as well as the two specifically paired
bacteria."
One problem with anaerobic bacteria
– and the reason the researchers looked into an uncharacterized mixture
of bacteria – is that currently the most efficient microbial fuel cells
use an air cathode. Unfortunately, it is impossible to have an air cathode
without
some oxygen leaking into the reaction
chamber, killing strictly anaerobic bacteria and reducing output.
One problem with anaerobic bacteria
– and the reason the researchers looked into an uncharacterized mixture
of bacteria – is that currently the most efficient microbial fuel cells
use an air cathode. Unfortunately, it is impossible to have an air cathode
without
"We tried an aerobic cathode with
the binary culture and it will not work," says Regan.
The researchers settled on a two-chamber
fuel cell that produced a maximum of 150 milliwatts per square meter.
"We achieved a low power density
because of the two chamber system," says Regan.
"Current fuel cell designs produce
about ten times that."
Currently the researchers are using
pure, processed cellulose without any hemicellulose or lignin. They are
just beginning to look at other cellulose products so the fuel cells can
operate on less manufactured feedstock.
As a proof of concept, the researchers
are happy with their results, but they would like to see the power density
increase. One approach would be to find a community of bacteria that could
tolerate small amounts of oxygen because some of the bacteria use up the
oxygen before it reached the anaerobic bacteria. Another approach would
be to improve the design of the oxygenless fuel cell.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
supported this work.
|