| University
Park, Pa. – Discarded crab and lobster shells may be the key to prolonging
the life of microbial fuel cells that power sensors beneath the sea, according
to a team of Penn State researchers.
To produce energy, microbial fuel
cells need organic material for the microbes to consume. However, deep
sea sediments can be surprisingly devoid of organic material because living
things in the photic zone – the area where light penetrates the water –
are continuously recycled and little falls to the ocean floor. An absence
of organics limits the lifetime of marine microbial fuel cells.
The researchers include chitin –
processed crustacean shells – in a pillow-like anode made of carbon cloth.
The anode is placed in the sediment or hung in the water where naturally
occurring bacteria can eat the chitin.
"This approach is good for deeper
ocean areas or anywhere we want to increase the power of marine microbial
fuel cells," says Bruce E. Logan, the Kappe Professor of Environmental
Engineering.
Microbial fuel cells work through
the action of bacteria which can pass electrons to an anode. The electrons
flow from the anode through a wire to the cathode, producing an electric
current. In the process, the bacteria consume organic matter in the water
or sediment. The Penn State approach uses the bacteria that naturally occur
in the oceans and because so many sea creatures produce chitinous shells,
many marine bacteria break down chitin.
Marine energy sources are often placed
in remote areas to power sensors for such measurements as temperature,
pressure, salinity, density, turbidity or particulate content. These sensors
could be placed on buoys or used to monitor around offshore drilling platforms
and to monitor for pollution or contamination, such as that caused by red
tide, in both salt and fresh water. Other small devices can measure sound,
light transmittance and conductivity. While the amounts of energy needed
for these purposes are small, the locations often necessitate long-term
remote operation.
The researchers, who included Logan;
Rachel A. Brennan, assistant professor of civil engineering; Tom L. Richard,
associate professor of agricultural and biological engineering; and Farzaneh
Rezaei, graduate student in agricultural and biological engineering, tested
two types of chitin and one type of cellulose.
"We found that cellulose was not
as good as chitin," Logan reported in the current issue of Environmental
Science and Technology. "The ocean is so used to chitin that there may
be more naturally occurring bacteria that eat chitin than those that eat
cellulose."
While the team has not tested the
marine microbial fuel cell in the ocean sediment, they did create a fuel
cell in the laboratory consisting of a glass bottle with the anode embedded
in the sediment on the bottom and the carbon paper and platinum cathode
suspended in the water. In the ocean, no container is needed, but the anode
and cathode must be close enough together so the protons or positive charge
can pass through the water to the cathode.
The researchers tested two different
sizes of chitin, one finer than the other and found that both increased
power production over the same set up without the additional bacterial
food supply. However, the finer particles produced almost twice the power
as the larger particles, suggesting that the bacteria can more easily consume
the smaller particles.
"We can adjust the particle size
to control the rate at which chitin is consumed and alter the power output
and the fuel cell's longevity," says Logan. "Technically, there is no reason
why we cannot put a bigger bag of feed for the anode to supply more food." |