EAST
AMWELL, New Jersey (Reuters) - Michael Strizki heats and cools his house
year-round and runs a full range of appliances including such power-guzzlers
as a hot tub and a wide-screen TV without paying a penny in utility bills.
His conventional-looking family home
in the pinewoods of western New Jersey is the first in the United States
to show that a combination of solar and hydrogen power can generate all
the electricity needed for a home.
The Hopewell Project, named for a
nearby town, comes at a time of increasing concern over U.S. energy security
and worries over the effects of burning fossil fuels on the climate.
"People understand that climate change
is a big concern but they don't know what they can do about it," said Gian-Paolo
Caminiti of Renewable Energy International, the commercial arm of the project.
"There's a psychological dividend in doing the right thing," he said.
Strizki runs the 3,000-square-foot
house with electricity generated by a 1,000-square-foot roof full of photovoltaic
cells on a nearby building, an electrolyzer that uses the solar power to
generate hydrogen from water, and a number of hydrogen tanks that store
the gas until it is needed by the fuel cell.
In the summer, the solar panels generate
60 percent more electricity than the super-insulated house needs. The excess
is stored in the form of hydrogen which is used in the winter -- when the
solar panels can't meet all the domestic demand -- to make electricity
in the fuel cell. Strizki also uses the hydrogen to power his fuel-cell
driven car, which, like the domestic power plant, is pollution-free.
Solar power currently contributes
only 0.1 percent of U.S. energy needs but the number of photovoltaic installations
grew by 20 percent in 2006, and the cost of making solar panels is dropping
by about 7 percent annually, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association.
As costs decline and the search accelerates
for clean alternatives to expensive and dirty fossil fuels, some analysts
predict solar is poised for a significant expansion in the next five to
10 years.
STATE SUPPORT
The New Jersey project, which opened
in October 2006 after four years of planning and building, cost around
$500,000, some $225,000 of which was provided by the New Jersey Board of
Public Utilities. The state, a leading supporter of renewable energy, aims
to have 20 percent of its energy coming from renewables by 2020, and currently
has the largest number of solar-power installations of any U.S. state except
California.
New
Jersey's utility regulator supported the project because it helps achieve
the state's renewable-energy goals, said Doyal Siddell a spokesman for
the agency.
"The solar-hydrogen residence project
provides a tremendous opportunity to reduce greenhouse gases that contribute
to global warming," he said.
The project also got equipment and
expertise from a number of commercial sponsors including Exide, which donated
some $50,000 worth of batteries, and Swageloc, an Ohio company that provided
stainless steel piping costing around $28,000. Strizki kicked in about
$100,000 of his own money.
While the cost may deter all but
wealthy environmentalists from converting their homes, Strizki and his
associates stress the project is designed to be replicated and that the
price tag on the prototype is a lot higher than imitators would pay. Now
that first-time costs of research and design have been met, the price would
be about $100,000, Strizki said.
But that's still too high for the
project to be widely replicated, said Marchant Wentworth of the Union of
Concerned Scientists, an environmental group in Washington. To be commonly
adopted, such installations would have to be able to sell excess power
to the grid, generating a revenue stream that could be used to attract
capital, he said.
"You need to make the financing within
reach of real people," Wentworth said.
Caminiti argues that the cost of
the hydrogen/solar setup works out at about $4,000 a year when its $100,000
cost is spread over the anticipated 25-year lifespan of the equipment.
That's still a lot higher than the $1,500 a year the average U.S. homeowner
spends on energy, according to the federal government. Even if gasoline
costs averaging about $1,000 per car annually are included in the energy
mix, the renewables option is still more expensive than the grid/gasoline
combination.
But for Strizki and his colleagues,
the house is about a lot more than the bottom line. It's about energy security
at a time when the federal government is seeking to reduce dependence on
fossil fuels from the Middle East, and it's about sustaining a lifestyle
without emitting greenhouse gases.
For the 51-year-old Strizki, the
project is his life's work. "I have dedicated my life to making the planet
a better place," he said.
© Copyright 2007 Reuters. Reuters
content is the intellectual property of Reuters or its third-party content
providers. Any copying, republication, or redistribution of Reuters content,
including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited
without the prior written consent of Reuters.

|