| NEW YORK--The
stock options timing scandal, which has already implicated at least 140
companies, could include hundreds more, according to a new analysis that
found lax enforcement of corporate governance reforms that should have
prevented the practice.
Investors have widely discounted
companies' misconduct over stock options timing because they believe most
of it pre-dates the Sarbanes-Oxley reforms on corporate governance of 2002
that were implemented in the wake of the Enron scandal.
But a report released over the weekend
from proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis & Co. showed that many firms may
not have filed properly options timing paperwork as recently as 2005.
"We believe the backdating scandal
may be entering its second act," Glass Lewis analyst Todd Fernandez said
in the report.
Backdating involves changing the
day that stock options were granted to an earlier date when a company's
stock was trading at a lower price, potentially allowing company executives
to lock in higher profits when they exercise their options.
Beginning in August 2002, the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission required companies to disclose their
stock-option awards in Form 4 filings within two days of options grants
to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley. Before that, companies did not have to report
option grants for several weeks.
The new regulations should have removed
most opportunities for backdating. But Glass Lewis, in the report, said
the SEC has not enforced the two-day filing rule, possibly leading to many
more instances of backdating.
More than 140 companies have launched
internal reviews or are under government investigation over possible manipulation
of stock option grant timing
But that number may grow as
Glass Lewis said an analysis of late Form 4 filings showed "hundreds" of
companies may have, intentionally or mistakenly, backdated grants after
the 2002 reforms.
"When rules are not enforced consistently,
they often are not followed," Fernandez said. "When we find late Form 4
filings where the price of the underlying stock increased materially between
the purported grant date and the day the Form 4 was filed, we believe this
raises legitimate questions about whether the grant was backdated."
The SEC could not be immediately
reached for comment.
Companies have said that many of
the late Form 4 filings were unintentional -- a result of sloppy paperwork--
and their options grants have been accounted for correctly.
The chairman of one of the companies
mentioned in the Glass Lewis report, Medis Technologies Ltd. (MDTL.O),
told Reuters that Medis had been late in some of its Form 4 filings but
did not engage in backdating of options.
"For some reason they fell through
the cracks," Robert Lifton, chairman and chief executive officer, of Medis,
a fuel cell technology company, said of several late Form 4s the company
filed from 2004 through 2005.
"Our attorneys and our auditors
have checked it and rechecked it and there was no backdating," Lifton told
Reuters. "We filed them late and we, ourselves, disclosed it in our proxy
statement."
Glass Lewis also raised concerns
about late Form 4s that could have resulted in higher profits for executives
at Hansen Natural Corp. (HANS.O: Quote, Profile, Research), O'Reilly Automotive
Inc. (ORLY.O: Quote, Profile, Research), Digital River Inc. (DRIV.O: Quote,
Profile, Research), American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. (AHM.N: Quote,
Profile, Research), Websense Inc. (WBSN.O: Quote, Profile, Research), Silicon
Image Inc. (SIMG.O: Quote, Profile, Research), and Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
Inc. (KERX.O: Quote, Profile, Research).
A spokesman for Websense, Cas Purdy,
said, "The late filings were unintentional and we filed the appropriate
forms when we became aware of it."
The other companies could not immediately
be reached for comment.
Children's Place Retail Stores Inc.
(PLCE.O: Quote, Profile, Research) was also mentioned in the report as
having been late in filing Form 4s after August 2002. The company earlier
this month said it expects to restate financial results for the past three
fiscal years and the first quarter of the current year due to errors in
the dating of stock options.
In several cases Glass Lewis said
the Form 4s were repeatedly filed late, raising questions about the quality
of internal controls over financial reporting at those firms.

|