| Before hydrogen
can be used as a transportation fuel, a safe storage system for the gas
must be found. Metal clusters that release hydrogen in response to an electric
current may be a step in the right direction.
With mounting concern over the environmental
impact of oil as a fuel, hydrogen increasingly looks like a useful alternative.
In principle, hydrogen can be generated in a clean way from water by using
sunlight in combination with solar cells. Moreover, it is non-polluting,
and forms an environmentally benign by-product — water — on combustion.
Hydrogen is thought to be an ideal fuel for vehicles, but its widespread
use is limited by the lack of a safe, efficient system for on-board storage.
The density and the condensation temperature of hydrogen are very low (-252
°C at 1 atmosphere), which makes it difficult to use conventional storage
systems such as high-pressure gas containers or cryogenic liquid-gas containers.
Therefore, the development of safe and convenient methods for hydrogen
storage is an active research area1. In Angewandte Chemie, Weller and co-workers
(Brayshaw et al.2) report that hydrogen may be stored and released using
molecular clusters, in a process that is easily controlled by a simple
chemical reaction or by an electric current.
One of the most successful and extensively
studied methods for hydrogen storage is to keep the gas in a 'hydride'
form3,4. In this approach, an alloy absorbs and holds a large amount of
hydrogen by chemically bonding with the gas to form metal hydride compounds4.
But although a hydrogen-storage alloy can absorb and release hydrogen without
compromising its own structure, heating is required to promote the release,
as this process takes up energy. The alloys studied so far usually require
a temperature of about 300 °C to provide hydrogen at 1 atmosphere pressure.
Figure 1 | Hydrogen uptake–release
cycle in molecular clusters.
Structure A is the hydrogen-storage
material developed by Weller and colleagues2; Rh represents rhodium atoms,
and PCy3 are bulky molecules bound to the metals. Clusters in the same
colour are in the same oxidation state (also indicated by the number of
positive charges on the clusters). The structures are simplified in the
depicted hydrogen uptake–release cycle. a, The 12-hydrogen-atom cluster
(A) takes up two hydrogen molecules to form a 16-hydrogen-atom cluster
(B). These hydrogen molecules may be removed under vacuum. b, The release
of one molecule of hydrogen from B is promoted by a reducing agent or by
the transfer of an electron (e-) from an electrode, to give the 14-hydrogen-atom
cluster (C). c, Chemical oxidation of C promotes the release of one molecule
of hydrogen, regenerating the starting material A. d, Under electrochemical
reduction conditions, the release of one molecule of hydrogen from C occurs
spontaneously, yielding a 12-hydrogen-atom cluster (D). This cluster is
not at the same oxidation state as A. e, Electrochemical oxidation of D
regenerates the starting material A.
In contrast, the method now reported
by Weller and colleagues2 enables hydrogen storage and controlled release
without a large input of energy. Their system is based on an organo-metallic
compound that contains a core of six rhodium atoms5, as part of a complex
that also includes 12 hydrogen atoms (Fig. 1). This cluster absorbs two
molecules of hydrogen (H2) to produce a compound holding 16 hydrogen atoms.
The absorption process takes 10 minutes at room temperature under 1 atmosphere
pressure of hydrogen, and is almost instanta-neous under 4 atmospheres
of hydrogen6,7. The absorbed hydrogen molecules are retained at room temperature
for weeks without any external hydrogen pressure (under an inert atmosphere
of argon), but can be removed under vacuum to quantitatively regenerate
the 12-hydrogen cluster, although this takes a long time (several days)
compared with the uptake process.
Remarkably, Weller and colleagues2
have found that hydrogen release from the 16-hydrogen cluster can be dramatically
accelerated simply by changing the cluster's oxidation state. Adding a
reducing agent to a solution of the 16-hydrogen compound releases one molecule
of hydrogen from each cluster, so yielding a product containing 14 hydrogen
atoms (Fig. 1). The original 12-hydrogen cluster is then easily regenerated
by treating the 14-hydrogen cluster with an oxidizing agent, liberating
another hydrogen molecule and completing the hydrogen uptake–release cycle.
Another crucial finding by Weller
and colleagues2 is that a rapid hydrogen uptake–release cycle can also
be accomplished electrochemically — that is, the reduction and oxidation
steps are achieved directly by electron transfers at electrodes. Adding
one electron to the 16-hydrogen cluster liberates a hydrogen molecule,
giving the 14-hydrogen cluster described above. This rapidly loses another
hydrogen molecule to yield a 12-hydrogen cluster, which differs from the
original starting material by having only one positive charge — the original
12-hydrogen cluster has two positive charges. The electrochemical hydrogen-release
process occurs in a matter of milliseconds on a glassy carbon electrode
at ambient temperature and pressure. The product of this process is easily
converted back to the original 12-hydrogen cluster by electrochemical oxidation
(electron removal at an electrode; Fig. 1). The overall electrochemical
process of hydrogen uptake and release can be repeated at will.
With the aid of theoretical calculations,
the authors2 inspected the electronic structures of the starting 12-hydrogen
cluster and of the 16-hydrogen cluster in this hydrogen-storage system.
They found that the energy level of the lowest-energy molecular orbital
that lacks electrons (known as the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital,
or LUMO) in the starting material is only slightly higher in energy than
that of the highest electron-filled orbital (the highest occupied molecular
orbital, or HOMO). This is why the LUMO readily accepts electrons donated
from hydrogen molecules. In contrast, the 16-hydrogen cluster has a large
HOMO–LUMO gap; the addition of an electron into the LUMO destabilizes the
molecule, and induces the release of a hydrogen molecule.
The hydrogen-storage capacity of
this rhodium system, expressed as the ratio of the mass of releasable hydrogen
to that of the storage system, is only 0.1%. This is clearly not sufficient
for practical applications — the US Department of Energy wants hydrogen-storage
systems to have a capacity of 6% weight-for-weight by 2010. Improved materials
must be developed with a greater number of usable hydrogen molecules, bound
to clusters of metals with an overall lower molecular mass. Never-theless,
this work2 provides a well-defined mol-ecular model and a worthwhile strategy
for the development of hydrogen-storage materials with high efficiency
and convenience.
References
1. Schlapbach, L. & Züttel,
A. Nature 414, 353–358 (2001).
2. Brayshaw, S. K. et al.
Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 45, 6005–6008 (2006).
3. Schüth, F., Bogdanovi,
B. & Felderhoff, M. Chem. Commun. 2249–2258 (2004).
4. Sandrock, G. J. Alloys
Compounds 293–295, 877–888 (1999).
5. Ingleson, M. J. et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 4784–4785 (2004).
6. Brayshaw, S. K. et al.
Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 44, 6875–6878 (2005).
7. Brayshaw, S. K. et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6247–6263 (2006).
Masanori Takimoto and Zhaomin Hou
Masanori Takimoto and Zhaomin Hou
are at RIKEN, the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Hirosawa
2-1, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.

|