| WASHINGTON
-- U.S. officials and automotive industry leeaders have agreed that hydrogen
fuel is the long-term solution to reducing the country's oil dependence,
but continue to debate whether the U.S. timeline for developing alternative
fuels is aggressive enough.
At the recent Group of Eight summit,
leaders projected that global energy demand will increase 50 percent by
2030. President Bush's Hydrogen Fuel Initiative, launched in 2003, called
for "technology readiness" for implementation of hydrogen fuel cells in
vehicles by 2015.
Yet as government funding for and
interest in developing the technology has increased, research realities
and companies' concerns over making the fuel commercially viable has tempered
hopes for a hydrogen-based economy in the near future.
At a hearing of the Senate Energy
and Natural Resources Committee July 17, David Garman, undersecretary of
energy at the Department of Energy, said that the current pace of research
is in step with the president's goal.
Since the launch of the initiative,
which promised $1.2 billion over five years to support fuel research and
development, researchers have doubled the lifetime of an automotive fuel
cell stack and brought down the cost of fuel cells from $275 per kilowatt
to $110 per kilowatt.
To reach parity with gasoline and
thus become a competitive option, fuel cells must further decrease in cost
to $30 per kilowatt. Researchers must also find a safe and commercially
attractive way to compress the amount of hydrogen fuel necessary to operate
a vehicle for hundreds of miles without refueling.
Mark Chernoby, vice president for
advance vehicle engineering at DaimlerChrysler, said at a news conference
at the National Press Club July 18 that the industry needs five to 10 years
of intensive research and development before it can consider producing
hydrogen-fueled cars on a mass scale.
"Customers are adjusting very quickly
to the technology," Chernoby said. "They're not intimidated by the thought
of using an alternative powertrain. One very important thing is that they
do not tolerate compromises in performance, they do not tolerate compromises
in utility, and they absolutely do not have the patience to deal with the
glitches in the new technology."
Achieving "technology readiness"
will be more a preliminary than final success, said Byron McCormick, executive
director of fuel cells activities for General Motors Corp, at the hearing.
McCormick estimated that it would take about 20 years to sell enough cars
to transition the entire U.S. fleet to hydrogen power.
"Since low volume equals high cost
in the automotive business, early vehicles -- even at moderate volumes
-- will still be expensive, even if our techhnology can compete at high
volume," McCormick said. "So we face the proverbial 'valley of death' for
new technologies as we attempt to grow the market.
"This is where we see the need for
creative policies, incentives, and governments as customers to support
the development of the market and creation of a high-volume-capable supply
system."
Congress is now considering a $289
million request for additional research funding. In May, the House passed
the H-Prize Act of 2006, promising a financial reward for advances in research
on hydrogen fuel storage, production, utilization or distribution, including
a $10 million grand prize for the development of "wells-to-wheels" technology.
But automotive companies have identified generating investment and market
interest, not funding, as their primary concern.
Tim Leuilette, chairman, president
and chief executive officer of Metaldyne, a leading automotive supply company,
attended both the conference and the hearing and compared the needs of
hydrogen researchers with the development of the Internet. Monetary support
for research is important, he said, but the government needs foremost to
act in a facilitating role, setting the underlying policy structure that
encourages investor confidence in the potential industry.
"Private equity is an incubator of
change, and we are at the cusp of change in this industry," Leuillette
told United Press International. "As long as a plan starts to develop,
we can start investing in it. And that's what's important here, because
no government, no single company or group of companies can afford to do
it by themselves."
Another obstacle to the development
of a hydrogen economy is the lack of infrastructure in place to support
it, said Mark Rodekhor, a visiting fellow at the energy program at the
Center for Strategic and International Studies, a centrist Washington think
tank, and director of the Energy Markets and Contingency Information Division
at the Energy Information Administration, the Energy Department's data
arm. Cars that have been developed to use hydrogen fuel will be useless
without hydrogen fuel suppliers and fueling stations. Investors must, in
turn, be assured of hydrogen technology's potential to be willing to build
the necessary infrastructure.
Until hydrogen fuels become a commercial
reality, fuel diversification is one short-term solution suggested by G8
leaders and experts.
"We need a consistent international
policy that helps us to diversify our sources of supply," Rodekhor told
UPI. "In this market, we have a lot of buyers, but 55 percent of world
oil sources are developed by state-owned companies, and we need to develop
a policy that will open us up to a lot of sellers.
"The resources are there. The issue
is government policies and willingness to bring those resources to market,
to allow private sector companies and other companies to bring them to
market."
Hydrogen is the most versatile of
all the alternative energies under research. Fossil fuels, biomass, nuclear
energy and renewable energy such as solar power are all possible hydrogen
sources. Substituting a hydrogen fuel cell for a car's internal combustion
engine eliminates all the car's emissions, but water. This potential has
pushed experts to sustain a focus on commercialization of hydrogen rather
than on short-term solutions.
"Hybrid vehicles won't get us there,"
McCormick said. "We look at the world and the pressures that will be there
both environmentally and energy-wise, and we're going to need every pound
of energy we can get. We've got to use it the most efficiently, and that
inevitably means hydrogen fuel cells. What we want to do is get away from
incrementalism."

|