| There is a
good chance that the future will be significantly powered by fuel cells.
Connecticut leads the United States in the production and research of them.
United Technologies in Hartford produces fuel cells; the Connecticut Global
Fuel Center at the University of Connecticut is prominent in fuel-cell
research.
With such activity already under
way nearby, there's no reason Eastern Connecticut should not be sniffing
about for our piece of the action.
For example, Norwich officials should
be considering tax incentives, identifying land in the business park or
a deal for a closed factory or brownfield property. The city ought to be
able to entice such an industry here.
In the business park, a parcel recently
rejected for condominiums could well be the site of scientific research
labs. Daticon, a provider of legal support services, in the business park,
changed ownership last year and may not be with us long-term; let's investigate
its plans and act accordingly.
With all that is taking place hereabouts
-- two casinos, the incipient Utopia projeect, Norwich on the cusp of dramatic
transformation -- this is the most exciting area of Connecticut, arguably
of all New England, even the Northeast.
Fuel cell technology is not complicated
and has been in use about 40 years.
Here, in a nutshell, is what fuel
cells are all about:
Alkaline-powered fuel cells provided
electricity and drinking water for the crew of Apollo 11 who visited the
Moon in 1969.
Fuel cells can be powered by several
sources: phosphoric acid, solid oxide, methanol, ethanol, gasoline and
more. NASA, among others worldwide, is exploring regenerative fuel cells.
They could become popular as closed-loop power generators. A solar-powered
electrolyser separates water into hydrogen and oxygen, which, in the cell,
generates electricity.
Fuel cells operate like batteries,
although they don't lose power and need not be recharged. They produce
energy and heat as long as fuel is supplied.
And energy production is caused by
chemical reaction -- not combustion. That makes them very attractive in
this age of global warming.
Like batteries, fuel cells can be
hooked up in series and power output increases proportionally to the added
cells.
This is clean technology, and scientific
researchers are well paid. If there is a downside to it, it's not readily
identifiable.
Fuel cells are in use all over the
place, and proponents say it's just a matter of time before they will power
devices as disparate as cell phones and automobiles. Fuel cells designed
for residential use -- with a power output of 5 kilowatts -- are about
the size of a small car. So, it's anyone's guess when fuel cells will be
so refined and miniaturized that they will accommodate cell phones, but
practical installation in production automobiles is said to be just a decade
away.
The day of the gasoline-powered internal-combustion
engine is fading fast. In fact, if gasoline-powered vehicles were invented
yesterday, the Environmental Protection Agency, among others, likely would
not tolerate internal combustion for vehicular travel.
When a motorist visits the gasoline
pump and fills the tank, the motorist thinks "20 gallons of fuel," while
the disinterested observer might think, "130 pounds of high explosive."
Fully 19 countries use fuel cells
as the partial power source for hospitals, office buildings, schools, power
plants and other applications.
Nearby, Mohegan Sun uses fuel cells
to augment its electricity and hot-water needs. The casino has two fuel
cells that produce 400 kilowatts of the 30 megawatts needed to power its
diverse functions.
In producing energy, most fuel cells
give off water as their waste product, and the energy is produced cheaply.
Those are very attractive advantages, but the darn things are big for the
function they perform, and they are pricey.
The two in use at the Sun were built
by United Technologies. With installation, the cost was $2.8 million.
Given all the advantages of fuel
cells -- water as byproduct, chemical reaction as power, multiple fuel
sources -- widespread use would seem a no-brainer. But issues such as size,
price and a refueling infrastructure must be figured out.
We advocate science teachers discussing
fuel cells in their classes to educate the next generation about what the
state is doing and how the cells have the potential to change their lives.
Fuel-cell energy production remains
more costly than combustion. With all their advantages over combustion,
the popularity and use of fuel cells is directly proportional to their
cost. Economics separates fuel cells from widespread use.
Last year's base realignment and
closure round nearly snatched away the U.S. submarine base at Groton and
threw a fright into the region and the state. We have got to act before
the Pentagon's next BRAC round successfully targets the sub base, and sub
builder Electric Boat has no reason to stay.
Such a development would cost the
state more than 30,000 jobs and $3 billion in annual economic activity.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
Norwich -- and/or other Eastern Connecticut communities -- should set about
attracting this industry. And quickly.

|