The
same technology that put men on the moon in 1969 could be the answer to
the country's energy problems, experts say, but right now it's just too
expensive and still years away.
Connecticut is leading the United
States in producing and researching fuel cells, including the Connecticut
Global Fuel Cell Center at the University of Connecticut. The cells run
on methanol, hydrogen and other fuels that are cheaper and more efficient
than traditional forms of energy.
"The technology is here. It works.
It's proven it works," said Jennifer Gangi, program director of Fuel Cells
2000, a Washington, D.C., group devoted to promoting the commercialization
of fuel cells.
The technology isn't new, though.
Apollo 11, the ship that took the first men to the moon, used fuel cells
for power.
State Sen. Donald Williams, president
pro tempore of the Senate, said fuel cells could lead to job growth and
slow job loss in Connecticut. When Franklin Farms, a mushroom farm, announced
in April it was closing, Williams suggested fuel cell technology could
be one way to cut costs for businesses that require high amounts of energy
to produce their products.
Most fuel cells use a chemical reaction
to produce energy and give off heat and water as by-products.
That's how the fuel cells at Mohegan
Sun work.
The casino uses two to produce 400
kilowatts of the 30 megawatts of power needed to run its facilities.
That could fuel up to 400 houses.
One megawatt is equal to 1,000 kilowatts.The cells send the hot water that
is produced to the restaurants and restrooms and the boiler system. The
energy produced is cheaper and there is an energy savings in heating water
in the boiler because it is already sent in hot.
Total savings is between $24,000
and $38,000 per month, according to Jean McInnis, environmental protections
department administrator for the tribe.
The casino also saves $310,000 each
year in payments to the state Department of Environmental Protection.
The DEP planned to charge Mohegan
Sun that much for elevated vehicle emissions from the hundreds of cars
that visit the casino each day. But fuel cells emit less than other energy
sources and that canceled out the vehicle emissions. McInnis said the cost
savings and the ability to help the environment made the decision to install
the cells a no-brainer.
Dan Webster, plant manager at the
casino, said he has had no problems with the cells since they were installed
in 2002.
"They run. They're reliable. We haven't
had any hiccups yet," Webster said. "The only time they ever go down is
for planned, routine maintenance."
Charlie Moret, managing director
of marketing and communications at Connecticut Innovations, which administers
the Connecticut Clean Energy Fund, said using fuel cells would reduce harmful
emissions from traditional power generation.
He said the state is requiring Connecticut
power companies to contract for 100 megawatts, which could power about
100,000 houses, to add to the electrical grid by 2008.
But cost is a major problem.
The cells cost Mohegan Sun $2.8 million
to install. A large casino would be able to make up that cost in the long
run, but smaller businesses, schools or households couldn't afford the
technology yet.
"The cost is probably the single
largest barrier to widespread development," said Herb Healey, senior manager
at United Technology in Hartford, which produced Mohegan Sun's fuel cells.
"We certainly have a ways to go in the industry to make them a significant
part of the generating capacity."
UConn's Global Fuel Cell Center is
working on ways to bring the cost of fuel cells down and find practical
uses for them.
Students work alongside researchers
at the center, which opened in 2002 under a partnership with Connecticut
Innovations and through grants from the state and federal governments.
The center's director, Ken Reifsnider,
said researchers are working on ways to make fuel cells more efficient
and smaller, so they can be used many ways, including powering cell phones,
laptop computers, vehicles and households.
"We're going to find out over the
next couple of years what it makes sense to use fuel cells in," Reifsnider
said.
Durability is another unknown.
"We don't know how long they work,"
Reifsnider said. "There's every evidence they're going to last a long time."
Research Scientist Zhen Guo recently
was working with a 1¼10-kilowatt fuel cell that runs on methanol.
It powers a small fan. Similar technology could be used to develop cells
for small portable devices, though they haven't been widely developed and
aren't cost effective.
"As long as you add methanol, it
will continue running," Guo said. "Last week it ran 200 hours."
While there have been huge steps
in developing fuel cells, Reifsnider and others say the technology won't
be in homes or vehicles anytime soon.
Gangi said she doesn't expect them
in affordable vehicles until 2015.
And the cells that could run a single
household still cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Right now, she said, they're primarily
used for back-up power for places that cannot afford to lose energy, such
as hospitals. But as the prices come down, they will soon make sense for
businesses here.
Gangi said another concern for some
is that hydrogen, which is highly flammable, is used as a fuel source in
fuel cells. But she pointed out that gasoline also is flammable.
Williams said fuel cells could mean
the difference between closing a manufacturing facility or keeping it open.
"It can help save jobs," Williams
said. "Until we find alternative fuel that is safe and reliable, jobs will
be reliant on fossil fuel prices."
Williams said the state needs to
step up and help subsidize the cost of purchasing the cells so they can
be used more often by businesses. Currently, the state has a $21 million
grant program for renewable energy.
Reifsnider said motivation is also
needed to make change.
"The only real reason to make change
in this country is cost savings," he said. "There's no question it's the
primary driver."
He said $3 per gallon for gasoline
hasn't pushed enough people to cry out for change. But he expects those
prices only to go higher and that, he said, will spur the need for renewable
energy sources.
"Fuel cells are a path to a sustainable
future. Gasoline is not a path to a sustainable future. In fact, it is
not a path to the future at all," Reifsnider said.

|